There’s a certain arrogance in a title like that (reminds me of the arrogance revealed in a similar title on St. Paul). The title implies that Barth interpreters of the past have got him all wrong or mostly wrong, and I’m here to tell you what Barth really said and what you should think about [...]
Archive for July, 2006
There’s Humor in Theology 7
Posted in There's Humor in Theology on July 26, 2006 | Leave a Comment »
This charming little anecdote comes from Stephen Hawking (not a theologian):
A well-known scientist (some say it was Bertrand Russell) once gave a public lecture on astronomy. He described how the Earth orbits around the sun and how the sun, in turn, orbits around the centre of a vast collection of stars called our galaxy. At [...]
Covenants and Biblical Theology (Part 2)
Posted in Biblical Theology, Covenant Theology, Exegesis, Theology on July 22, 2006 | 9 Comments »
Discussion Resumed
In my last post I sought to make the argument that God made a covenant with creation, which included man as made in the image of God. As soon as Scripture presents man made in the image of God, the reader would make the connection that man was appointed to rule the creation, which [...]
There’s Humor in Theology 6
Posted in There's Humor in Theology on July 19, 2006 | 1 Comment »
On the maiden posting of “There’s Humor in Theology” I offered this disclaimer:
Martin Luther is a man of his time and as such cannot be expected to follow twenty-first-century taboos. Moreover, I have no desire to censor him. In other words, there may be some cursing and some bathroom humor.
The following quote is the kind of thing I had [...]
There’s Humor In Theology 5
Posted in There's Humor in Theology on July 12, 2006 | Leave a Comment »
Martin Luther’s theology sometimes defies explanation. Luther can be an enigmatic and mysterious fellow. Just when you think you understand him he goes and offers the following advice. So what does Luther suggest for battling depression and despair?
Never be alone. Act foolish and play. Drink a good deal. It would even be a good idea [...]
Covenants and Biblical Theology (Part 1)
Posted in Biblical Theology, Theology on July 9, 2006 | 17 Comments »
Presuppositions in Approach to Biblical Theology
Before beginning a study of this magnitude, a writer’s presuppositions should be placed in clear view for all readers to see. First, the canon of Scripture will be the object of our study. Evangelicals will not debate this point, but James Barr (The Concept of Biblical Theology) has questioned whether [...]
Knowledge, Fake Barns, and Sherlock Holmes
Posted in Epistemology, History of Philosophy, Philosophy, Theology on July 3, 2006 | 2 Comments »
It’s one of life’s little ironies that every person on earth possesses knowledge and makes claims to knowledge while the criteria of knowledge remain so difficult to identify. Analytic philosophy has offered many claims on what are the conditions for knowledge: the familiar justified true belief formula; warranted true belief; William Alston’s epistemic desiderata approach; reliabilism; etc. Not [...]
Blog Update
Posted in Uncategorized on July 1, 2006 | Leave a Comment »
Hi All! We want to express our thanks to you for making our blogging experience enjoyable so far. We have appreciated your thoughtful comments and interactions with our posts on the doctrine of Scripture (even if some of our posts were a little long ). We are leaving the doctrine of Scripture for the time being and [...]